CONFIRMATION

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

FOR

DR. JOSEPH W. WESTPHAL

FROM THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES

UNITED STATES SENATE

  

Defense Reforms 

More than a decade has passed since the enactment of the Goldwater-Nichols Department of Defense Reorganization Act of 1986 and the Special Operations reforms. 

    1. Do you support full implementation of these defense reforms? 

A. Yes, I support full implementation of these reforms. The objectives of Goldwater-Nichols most directly relevant to the mission of the ASA(CW) are as important today as when the Act was passed. They provide for more efficient and effective use of defense resources and they improve the management and administration of the Department of Defense (including the Department of the Army).

Defense Reforms 

More than a decade has passed since the enactment of the Goldwater-Nichols Department of Defense Reorganization Act of 1986 and the Special Operations reforms. 

  1. What is your view of the extent to which these defense reforms have been implemented? 
  2. It is my understanding that the Army has implemented the Goldwater-Nichols reforms. In addition, the Department of the Army has also implemented reform initiatives in the Civil Works Program that will improve efficiency in the use of manpower and budget resources. I will be better able to assess the extent to which these reforms have been successful if I am confirmed and able to serve in the capacity of ASA(CW) for a period of time. I would be happy to report to the Committee, at a later date, my understanding of the Civil Works reform initiatives.
  3. Defense Reforms 

    More than a decade has passed since the enactment of the Goldwater-Nichols Department of Defense Reorganization Act of 1986 and the Special Operations reforms. 

  4. What do you consider to be the most important aspects of these defense reforms? 
  5. There are a number of important defense reforms included in Goldwater-Nichols. Three that are particularly important are: (1) strengthening civilian control; (2) providing for more efficient use of defense resources; and (3) enhancing the effectiveness of military operations and improving the management and administration of the Department of Defense.
  6. Defense Reforms 

    The goals of the Congress in enacting these defense reforms, as reflected in section 3 of the Goldwater-Nichols Department of Defense Reorganization Act, can be summarized as strengthening civilian control; improving military advice; placing clear responsibility on the combatant commanders for the accomplishment of their missions; ensuring the authority of the combatant commanders is commensurate with their responsibility; increasing attention to the formulation of strategy and to contingency planning; providing for more efficient use of defense resources; and enhancing the effectiveness of military operations and improving the management and administration of the Department of Defense. 

  7. Do you agree with these goals? 
  8. A. Yes, I agree with the goals cited in section 3 of Goldwater-Nichols. They are as valid today as they were in 1986.

    Defense Reforms 

    Recently, there have been articles which indicate an interest within the Department of Defense in modifying Goldwater-Nichols in light of the changing environment and possible revisions to the national strategy. 

  9. Do you anticipate that legislative proposals to amend Goldwater-Nichols may be appropriate? If so, what areas do you believe it might be appropriate to address in these proposals? 
  10. I have not yet had an opportunity to consider whether changes to Goldwater-Nichols may be warranted. 
  11. Relationships 

    In carrying out your duties, what would be your relationship with: 

  12. The Under Secretary of the Army? 
  13. It is the prerogative of the Secretary of the Army to specifically define the relationship between the ASA(CW) and the Under Secretary of the Army. The Under Secretary is the Secretary of the Army=s principal civilian assistant and senior advisor on key Army issues. I look forward to working with the Under Secretary of the Army as I carry out my duties as the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works). 
  14. Relationships 

    In carrying out your duties, what would be your relationship with: 

  15. The other Assistant Secretaries of the Army? 
  16. Each of the Assistant Secretaries of the Army has clear duties and responsibilities. In fulfilling my duties and exercising my authorities as the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works), it will be necessary for me to work closely with the other Assistant Secretaries. For example:  

Relationships 

In carrying out your duties, what would be your relationship with: 

    1. The Army General Counsel? 
    2. As with the other Assistant Secretaries, the General Counsel of the Army has specific duties and responsibilities. The General Counsel is the chief legal advisor in the Army and a source of important legal counsel. The Office of the General Counsel and the Office of the ASA(CW) have always had, and will continue to have, a close and excellent working relationship. 

Relationships 

In carrying out your duties, what would be your relationship with: 

  1. The Chief of Engineers? 
  2. I believe the relationship between the Assistant Secretary (CW) and the Chief of Engineers best serves the interest of the Nation when it is based on mutual respect, trust and cooperation. Both positions have enormous responsibilities and demand great attention to very complex issues. I believe LTG Ballard (Chief of Engineers) and I (if confirmed) will have such a relationship. 
  3. My responsibility for the overall policy direction and oversight of the Civil Works Program, the formulation of the President=s budget and the development of legislative initiatives, will require collaboration with, and cooperation of, the Chief of Engineers. We must stand together and work together to meet the challenges of the many complex issues facing the program. 

    Our ability to be responsive to the President=s priorities and to the policy directives of the Congress depends greatly on the success of this relationship. I look forward to working with this Chief, in leading the Corps into the next century. 

    Relationships

    In carrying out your duties, what would be your relationship with: 

  4. District Engineers? 
  5. The Corps of Engineers provides engineering and other services for its civil works customers. The successful delivery of these products and services occurs at the District Engineer level and it is at the district level where the public most frequently evaluates the investment of their tax dollars. In close cooperation with the Office of the Chief, I expect to be kept informed on major district issues and activities. I will work with the Chief to ensure that policies promulgated by my office are clearly understood and successfully implemented. 
  6. Upon confirmation, I will work with the Chief to develop a mutually agreeable way to maintain open levels of communications between my office and the Divisions and Districts. There must be a constant openness between the OASA(CW) and the field offices of the Corps to develop a proactive and collaborative spirit that will enhance our ability to react swiftly and appropriately to all unforeseen scenarios which may occur in the districts. 

    Use of Military Personnel 

    Like many federal agencies the Corps of Engineers workload is declining in all areas other than operations and maintenance of the facilities. 

  7. Since most of this work is done by the civilian contractors or civilian employees, what role do you see for the hundreds of military personnel currently working in the districts and divisions? 
  8. A. There are currently 208 military personnel working in the Corps districts and divisions. These officers carry out important project management, regulatory, and environmental activities. The management skills these officers develop are of tremendous value to the Army in future assignments, as these officers participate in contingency operations and emergency situations, both domestically and internationally. About half of these officers serve in command positions and the other half provide interface with our military customers on Army Posts and Air Force Bases.

    Wetlands Permits 

    One of the more controversial issues the Corps of Engineers has to deal with is that of wetlands permits. 

  9. Do you believe that the permit process needs to be expedited? 
  10. A. Yes. Although I believe that most applicants currently receive permit decisions in a timely manner, improvements can and should be made. The Department of the Army evaluates an average of 40,000-50,000 permit actions per year. Through the issuance of General Permits, the Corps has done an excellent job of expediting the permit process for a large segment of these applications. Nearly 80% of the total annual permit applications are approved in an average of 16 days. The remaining 20% (8,000-10,000 permit actions) must be evaluated as individual permits. The individual permit process involves extensive coordination with the public and Federal and State agencies. It also may involve the preparation of environmental impact statements. 

    All of these activities take time, but I am hopeful that there are opportunities to expedite the process consistent with the laws passed by the Congress.

    Wetlands Permits 

    One of the more controversial issues the Corps of Engineers has to deal with is that of wetlands permits. 

    (LEAD IN FROM PREVIOUS QUESTION - ADO YOU BELIEVE THAT THE PERMIT PROCESS NEEDS TO BE EXPEDITED?) 

  11. If so, what actions should be taken to expedite the wetlands permit process? 
  12. I will ensure that the General Permit Program remains strong and is improved where possible. I also will promote early planning to help communities identify sensitive areas where obtaining a permit may be more difficult or require extensive mitigation. This will reduce delays for applicants. I also will work with States to reduce any duplication that may exist between Federal and State programs.
  13. Responsiveness 

    The Corps of Engineers has a reputation for being difficult when dealing with the average citizen and small businesses. 

  14. Do you have any views on how the Corps can be more responsive to the average citizen or small business? 
  15. I believe in promoting open communication and positive relationships with everyone having an interest in the Civil Works program. I will work closely with the Chief of Engineers to set performance goals and standards so that the Corps can measure its performance against the Abest in the business.@ I understand the Chief of Engineers has established a requirement for an annual conference with small businesses to enable them to understand how to do business with the Corps. I look forward to working with the Chief of Engineers on this and other initiatives which will improve our relationships with small businesses and the public in general. 
  16. Working with State Authorities 

  17. Will you commit that, if confirmed, the United States Corps of Engineers will work cooperatively with state and local authorities for the mutual benefit of the citizens of the various states and communities and for natural resources? 
  18. In my nearly ten years as Director of the Congressional Sunbelt Caucus, I focused on the issues and needs of States and local communities in the region, working in the interest of Members of Congress to improve the quality of life of citizens. I remain committed, as I believe the Army Corps of Engineers is, to working cooperatively with State and local authorities for the mutual benefit of local citizens and for the protection of natural resources. These cooperative efforts must be undertaken in the context of the Corps authorities and legal responsibilities, including in many cases, a balancing of diverse interests. The reconciliation of these interests requires open communication among all parties, to which I am also committed. 
  19. Stewardship 

  20. Will you commit that, if confirmed, you will review all current and proposed Corps of Engineers projects to ensure that they fully comply with all environmental laws and that they are being pursued in a manner that does not imprudently spend taxpayers= money? 
  21. If confirmed, I will work to ensure that Civil Works projects comply with all applicable environmental laws. I also will be vigilant in helping to ensure that taxpayers= dollars are wisely spent. Before embarking on a nationwide review of projects to determine whether they comply with environmental laws, I would review the programs and procedures already in place whose purpose is to ensure such compliance. I believe it would be more prudent to begin by first improving management and oversight procedures. I would, of course, diligently pursue reports of non-compliance with Federal and State statutes at Civil Works projects and would support changes necessary to bring such projects into compliance. 
  22. Existing policies require specific reviews of projects proposed for authorization by Congress to ensure compliance with all appropriate environmental laws and regulations. This will continue to be a priority if I am confirmed by the Senate.

    Stewardship 

  23. Will you also commit that if you find projects where management of those projects indicate money has not been wisely spent that you will conduct an investigation to ensure that money is either replaced or that project is terminated or other prudent action is taken? 
  24. I take very seriously the trust responsibility placed in me to wisely and properly oversee the expenditure of public funds on authorized projects and programs. I would emphasize that this responsibility includes prudently managing Federal funds as well as cost sharing contributions from State and local project sponsors. I would pursue and rectify management decisions which are found to be in conflict with statutory requirements. I will work with the Chief to ensure rigorous oversight is provided throughout the planning budgeting and construction process for authorized projects and programs.   
  25. Environment and Natural Resources

    Will you ensure under your administration that all commitments in the way of mitigation for environmental damage by the Corps and any other commitments concerning safeguarding the environment are totally and completely fulfilled? 

  26. Today, protecting the environment and mitigating the impacts of Corps projects is an important part of the Civil Works mission. If confirmed, I will work to ensure that the Corps meets its responsibilities in this area. Cases may arise, however, where schedules for meeting environmental mitigation commitments must be reconsidered due to budgetary constraints. 
  27. As in all matters regarding the environment and natural resources, I pledge to work with the States, tribes, local governments, citizens and of course, other Federal agencies to work in a partnership approach that includes input from Congress.  

    Environment and Natural Resources 

  28. Will you commit to improve the working relationship between the Corps of Engineers and the various state natural resource agencies? 
  29. Yes, I will commit to improving these relationships. I believe that the future success of the Civil Works program is dependent on establishing good working relationships with other Federal agencies to ensure that State and local partners are not confused or misled by policies emanating from Washington. Further, I believe that sensitivity to local interests can be achieved by working closely with States, tribes, local governments and the public through good communication, mutual respect and the involvement of Members of Congress in their representative capacity. 
  30. The water resources issues we deal with are very complex and often involve competing project purposes and different approaches to achieving objectives. If confirmed, I will work with the Chief to further improve our ability to communicate with local interests and be more responsive to their needs. 

    State Water Quality Standards 

    In the past, the United States Army Corps of Engineers has not been required to meet state water quality standards in constructing and operating their water resources projects. 

  31. Do you believe that the Army Corps of Engineers should be required to meet state water quality standards in constructing and operating Corps projects in order to protect fishery resources? 
  32. Yes, I believe as a matter of policy the Corps should meet State water quality standards in constructing and operating Corps projects. I also believe that the Corps should take all practicable measures consistent with authorized project purposes, to protect and enhance important fishery resources at Corps projects. 
  33. State Water Quality Standards 

    In the past, the United States Army Corps of Engineers has not been required to meet state water quality standards in constructing and operating their water resources projects. 

  34. What is your opinion as to the responsibility of the United States Army Corps of Engineers to avoid construction or operation of hydroelectric projects which are demonstrated to kill large numbers of fish? 
  35. I believe that the Corps has a responsibility to avoid to the maximum extent practicable fishery impacts at its hydroelectric facilities. Unavoidable impacts to fishery resource also should be mitigated. Solutions must, however, be cost effective, have a reasonable likelihood of success, and be consistent with applicable laws and authorized project purposes.
  36. Panama Canal 

    Given your broad experience in water policy and experience in Latin America, you appear well qualified to chair the Panama Canal Commission supervisory board. 

  37. Is this a responsibility you expect to have if confirmed as Assistant Secretary for Civil Works? 
  38. The Panama Canal Act of 1979 provides that the Secretary of Defense, or his designee, shall be one of the nine members of the Board of the Panama Canal Commission. The Chairman is elected by the Board members. Currently, the Secretary of the Army serves as the Secretary of Defense designee, and he has been elected Chairman by the other Board members. As the Assistant Secretary of Army, I will dutifully represent the Department, and support the Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of Defense in any roles they delegate to me.
  39.  Panama Canal 

    Given your broad experience in water policy and experience in Latin America, you appear well qualified to chair the Panama Canal Commission supervisory board. 

    Q. What is your opinion of water management in the Canal watershed? 

  40. I am not familiar enough with water management in the Canal to form an opinion. I understand that the Panama Canal Treaty assigns rights to the water of the lakes and their tributary streams to the Panama Canal Commission (PCC) for the operation of the Panama Canal. The PCC manages these waters for Canal operations, as well as for water supply and hydropower generation. After the year 2000, the Organic Law of Panama creates the Panama Canal Authority (PCA). This law, and an amendment to the Panamanian Constitution known as the Constitutional Title, authorize the PCA to manage the Canal and the adjacent watershed lands. 
  41. Panama Canal 

    Given your broad experience in water policy and experience in Latin America, you appear well qualified to chair the Panama Canal Commission supervisory board. 

  42. What is your opinion on the unexploded ordnance issue in Panama? 
  43. A. The Panama Canal Treaty requires the United States to A...take all measures to ensure insofar as may be practicable that every hazard to human life, health and safety is removed...@ from real property being returned to Panama. The Treaty is binding on the Army, as an Executive Branch agency, and we intend to fully comply with the Treaty. U.S. military ranges are home to a treasure trove of endangered species C both flora and fauna. The ranges contain thousands of acres of dense rainforest and are critical to the protection of the Panama Canal watershed. In determining what level of unexploded ordnance (UXO) cleanup is practicable, we must consider: that removing UXO may harm the environment; the potential danger of the UXO to humans; the safety of personnel conducting the removal; and the cost, time, and technology available. 

    In preparing the DOD properties for transfer to Panama, a range of options will be considered, including leaving UXO in place. In those areas where removal of UXO may be practicable from safety and environmental perspectives, the Corps of Engineers has a capability to perform UXO identification, risk assessment, and removals. Currently, the Corps is assisting the Panama Canal Commission with UXO characterization of a portion of Empire Range, adjacent to the Canal, in connection with the construction of a new lock. Any assistance to the Panama Canal Commission or the U.S. Southern Command will be closely coordinated with the Panama Canal Treaty Implementation Agency. 

    Panama Canal 

    Given your broad experience in water policy and experience in Latin America, you appear well qualified to chair the Panama Canal Commission supervisory board. 

  44. As the Senior Policy Advisor for Water with the EPA, have you looked at the costs to the United States of El Nino effects? 
  45. During my tenure as Senior Policy Advisor for Water at the Environmental Protection Agency, neither the Agency nor I personally became involved in tracking the costs of El Nino. Although the Agency sometimes conducts analysis of the water quality costs associated with natural disasters, such as the Great Midwest Floods of 1993, no such effort has been undertaken with regard to El Nino as of this time. 
  46. Panama Canal 

    Given your broad experience in water policy and experience in Latin America, you appear well qualified to chair the Panama Canal Commission supervisory board. 

  47. Do you believe that El Nino is largely responsible for a substantial decrease in Canal revenues? If so, explain. 
  48. I understand that the Panama Canal has experienced lower than expected revenues in FY 1997 and does expect a moderate decline in FY 1998. However, the Panama Canal Commission does not attribute these declines to the El Nino phenomenon. Rather, the lower revenue is primarily related to a shift in trade patterns for bulk commodities, the Asian financial crisis, and reduced petroleum-related traffic caused by a mild U.S. winter and shifts in oil production. However, El Nino is having significant effects on Canal operations. So far, nine successive draft restrictions (in six-inch increments) have been announced, to be effective until April 30, 1998. Further restrictions are possible. These restrictions have not had an effect on revenues, because ships are charged based upon their earning capacity, not on the amount of cargo they are actually carrying. While the draft restrictions may result in a reduction in the amount of cargo that a vessel transiting the waterway may carry, the amount charged for its toll remains the same.
  49. Panama Canal 

    Given your broad experience in water policy and experience in Latin America, you appear well qualified to chair the Panama Canal Commission supervisory board.

  50. As an expert in political science and legislatures, are you satisfied that the Panamanian law for the Canal will effectively insulate the Panama Canal Authority from Panamanian politics? 
  51. On May 14, 1997, the Legislative Assembly of the Republic of Panama passed a bill to create the Panama Canal Authority (PCA). The Organic Law creates the basic legal framework under which the PCA will operate the Canal after it is returned to Panama on December 31, 1999. This law envisions the adoption of a comprehensive set of regulations to cover operational and administrative matters. It is my hope that these laws and regulations will establish a framework to enable the PCA to operate the Canal in an effective and efficient manner. 
  52. As I have observed, Panama is undergoing significant political and social changes due in part to the downsizing of the U.S. presence and the country=s future task of operating the Canal. While one can never be fully satisfied that laws can act to insulate a process from politics, I remain hopeful that Panama will be able to manage this task if it continues to uphold democratic principles and maintain free and fair elections. 

    International Policies 

  53. What plans, if any, do you have for policies that leverage the capabilities of the Army Corps of Engineers internationally, specifically through the Support for Others program? 
  54. The Corps of Engineers can play an important role in advancing the national interest of the United States internationally. The engineering and environmental capabilities of the Corps can further the objectives of the National Security Strategy which are to enhance our security, bolster America=s economic prosperity, and promote democracy abroad. In order to provide this support, the Corps must have a paying customer either within the Department of Defense, another Federal agency, an international organization, another country or a private U.S. firm. 
  55. If confirmed, I hope to make the Corps capabilities more widely known to these customers and to identify how the Corps can support the United States= interests internationally. I will make the Corps available when Corps capabilities enhance the United States= interests. Also, I will work with the Chief to ensure that domestic interests are not sacrificed and that the Corps works with the U.S. private sector in it=s work abroad.

    Vision for the Corps of Engineers 

  56. What is your vision for the future of the Corps of Engineers? 
  57. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has served this country well for more than 200 years. During this long and important service, the Corps has become the Nation=s premiere water resources and engineering organization. This reputation extends beyond the United States as the Corps is seen perhaps the world=s best engineering organization. 
  58. As a Nation, we have made a huge investment in the Corps and its work. Our progress in commerce and trade, flood protection, electric hydropower generation, providing water supply, aiding with national disaster relief and enhancing and increasing recreation areas has contributed to our Nation=s economic growth and development. It=s organization, efficiency and expertise are the very reflection of this Nation=s progress to date. That a Nation can combine within the broad mantle of its Army, civil infrastructure support to local communities, with its national security interests, says much about our confidence in our Constitution, our military leaders and our representative form of government. 

    I believe we must continue to build on this investment and in the confidence and support of the people of this country in this organization. With an annual budget for research, construction, operations and maintenance of approximately $3.6 billion, the Nation derives an annual economic development benefit of $32.6 billion, generating $22.6 billion in Federal tax revenues. Building on this investment, we must now look to the future needs of the country and to the role the Corps can play in alleviating increasing pressures due to population growth and an expanding economy, and in creating new priorities for protecting and enhancing our environment and our Nation=s natural resources for future generations. The Corps is adjusting well to these new pressures, for example, assuming an increasingly greater role in environmental protection and restoration. 

    As our issues and problems become more complex and competing interests grow, we must be ready to work in partnership with States, tribes, local governments, citizens and other Federal agencies to build on our Nation=s investment, maintain economic growth, protect our environment and enhance the quality of life for future generations. My vision for the future of the Corps is for an organization that is responsive to the many interests represented by the Congress, that is adept at working with its Federal partners in solving real problems for our citizens, and that is innovative and creative in serving the President and Commander-in-Chief in both domestic civil works and emergency response as well as our Nation=s vital national security interests. 

    I believe we have great leadership in the Corps, prepared to advance the Nation=s interest into the 21st Century. I look forward to working with the Secretary of the Army, the Chief of Engineers and the elected representatives of the American people to provide the very best service and products to our communities through the Army Civil Works Program. 

    Vision for the Corps of Engineers 

  59. Do you support the Corps of Engineers= current role in harbor and inland waterway maintenance and improvement? 
  60. I fully support the Corps of Engineers= current role in harbor and inland waterway maintenance and improvement. This historic Corps mission is essential to the economy and maintaining our competitiveness in international trade. The Corps has demonstrated its ability to respond to the needs of the ports, maritime users, and waterway industry, and is well suited to provide safe, reliable, and efficient waterborne transportation systems (channels, harbors and waterways) for movement of commerce, national security needs, and recreation. If confirmed, I commit to working closely with the Congress in this area. 
  61. Federal and State Responsibilities 

    Q. What is your opinion of the current division between state and federal responsibilities with respect to ports and inland waterways? 

    A. The current division of responsibilities between the States and Federal Government has worked quite well for some time. Recently, however, budget constraints have resulted in major discrepancies between the Federal budget and the development plans of some port authorities. I would work with others in the Executive Branch, in Congress and at the State and local levels to reconcile these differences, which are impeding the efficient development of ports and inland waterways. Moreover, now that the Supreme Court has declared the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund to be unconstitutional, it is imperative that the Executive and Legislative Branches, port authorities and industry come together and advance a plan for continued financing of harbor maintenance.  

    Infrastructure Management 

  62. What is your opinion of the division of labor between the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Installations, Logistics and Environment and the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works (CW) with regard for base infrastructure and operations? 
  63. The Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations, Logistics and Environment) has the sole responsibility in the Army for base infrastructure and operations. The Corps supports these base infrastructure and operations activities through its Military Programs Directorate. The Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) has responsibility for the Corps of Engineers Civil Works program and the Support for Others Program, through which the Corps provides reimbursable engineering and construction management, real estate and environmental support for Federal agencies outside the Defense Department. 
  64. Major Challenges 

  65. What do you consider to be the major challenges in the management of Civil Works programs? 
  66. The management of the Civil Works program poses several significant challenges. These challenges include retaining and strengthening technical competence in the face of declining resources; effectively shaping the Civil Works program to embrace a broader array of mission objectives; and building more productive partnerships with other Federal agencies, States, and local project sponsors. One particularly difficult management challenge is establishing a consensus between the Administration and the Congress on the appropriate funding level for the Civil Works program. Restoring stability to funding levels will provide for greater certainty in the execution of Corps projects, and promote greater project sponsor confidence. 
  67. Major Challenges 

  68. If confirmed, what plans do you have for addressing these challenges? 
  69. If I am confirmed as Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works, I will exercise leadership within the Administration to address the important issues I have described, and I will promote a constructive dialogue between the Administration and Congress to find effective solutions to this Nation=s water resources needs. 
  70. Most Serious Problems 

  71. What do you consider to be the most serious problems in the performance of the functions of Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works? 
  72. I believe one of the most important tasks for me will be to establish a clear and positive leadership role as the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works. To accomplish this objective, I plan to build a productive partnership between the Army Secretariat and the Corps of Engineers at all levels. This partnership will be based on mutual respect and recognition of the important role all of us play in enabling the Corps of Engineers to serve the American people in the most efficient and effective way possible. 
  73. Most Serious Problems 

  74. What management actions and time lines would you establish to address these problems? 
  75. Effective relationships are not built by blueprint according to fixed time lines. The productive and mutually-beneficial relationship I seek will evolve from working shoulder-to-shoulder in resolving the issues that arise on a daily basis. 
  76. Qualifications 

    If confirmed, you will be entering this important position at a time of concern about the adequacy of the budget, force levels and readiness of our forces. 

  77. What background and experience do you have that you believe qualifies you for this position? 
  78. A. Throughout my professional career, I have emphasized the need to work with others, to be practical in my approach and to seek consensus and cooperation in decisionmaking. As a professor, I worked a great deal with the Oklahoma State Legislature and the Governor in developing workable solutions to an array of public policy issues concerning water resources development in the State and region. 

    In my ten years working as a staff member, first in the House and later in the Senate, I learned the art of working complex issues requiring negotiation and consensus. I spent those ten years working in a bipartisan, bicameral forum and realizing that we could achieve consensus if communication, trust and good information were present. In this highly charged political arena, I learned much about process and was able to work very well with Members of both parties and the Executive in achieving workable solutions to our issues. 

    My academic background and management experience combined with years of work in both Congress and the Executive Branch on a bipartisan basis, enhance my ability to take on this very important position. My work at EPA on Clean Water Act initiatives, and my previous experience working at the Corps and the U.S. Department of the Interior will provide me with an excellent perspective on the need and potential for Federal agencies to work together. 

    My work on regional development, decentralization of government, institution building and democratic processes on behalf of USAID and USIA Democracy Programs in Latin American over the last fifteen years have also given me a good perspective on relations with local governments, federalism issues, the role of the military in a democracy, and the importance of representative government.

    I believe my background is strong by the experience that I have gained in the past twenty years of working in all these areas. I stand ready to observe, learn and work with those around me to serve in this position with integrity, common sense and a positive attitude. 

    Qualifications 

    If confirmed, you will be entering this important position at a time of concern about the adequacy of the budget, force levels and readiness of our forces. 

  79. Do you believe that there are any steps that you need to take to enhance your expertise to perform the duties of the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works? 
  80. Yes. I intend to take several actions to enhance my expertise as Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works). I intend to travel to each Corps of Engineers division to see first hand many of the infrastructure development and environmental restoration projects. My goal is to gain a fuller understanding of the issues that surround the construction, operation, and maintenance of these projects. I also intend to reach out to Members of Congress, the other Federal agencies, and State and local interests to gain a deeper appreciation of their concerns and perspectives on areas of mutual concern. If confirmed, I also will develop a closer working relationship with other offices within the Department of the Army and the Department of Defense in order to make better use of resources and opportunities for the Civil Works Program. 
  81. I intend to work closely with the Chief and the Director of Civil Works to be better informed, prepared and knowledgeable in my tenure at this position. I look forward to the challenge and the experience this position affords.

    Congressional Oversight 

    In order to exercise its legislative and oversight responsibilities, it is important that this Committee and other appropriate Committees of the Congress are able to receive testimony, briefings, and other communications of information. 

  82. Do you agree, if confirmed for this high position, to appear before this Committee and other appropriate Committees of the Congress? 
  83. A. Yes

    Congressional Oversight 

    In order to exercise its legislative and oversight responsibilities, it is important that this Committee and other appropriate Committees of the Congress are able to receive testimony, briefings, and other communications of information. 

  84. Do you agree, when asked, to give your personal views, even if those views differ from the Administration in power? 
  85. Yes
  86. Congressional Oversight 

    In order to exercise its legislative and oversight responsibilities, it is important that this Committee and other appropriate Committees of the Congress are able to receive testimony, briefings, and other communications of information. 

  87. Do you agree, if confirmed, to appear before this Committee, or designated Members of this Committee, and provide information, subject to appropriate and necessary security protection, with respect to your responsibilities as the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works? 
  88. A. Yes

    Congressional Oversight 

    In order to exercise its legislative and oversight responsibilities, it is important that this Committee and other appropriate Committees of the Congress are able to receive testimony, briefings, and other communications of information. 

  89. Do you agree to ensure that testimony, briefings and other communications of information are provided to this Committee and its staff and other appropriate Committees? 
  90. Yes