Statement of

The Honorable Rudy de Leon

Under Secretary of Defense

(Personnel and Readiness)

Before the Personnel Subcommittee

Senate Armed Services Committee

March 18, 1998







Introduction



Mr. Chairman and members of this distinguished subcommittee, it is a privilege to be here today. I would like to begin by thanking each of you for your support during, and since, my confirmation last July as Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness.

Our national security relies on the quality and commitment of the men and women in uniform and the civilian employees who support them. I can attest to their dedication to our national defense. At any given time over the past few years, 35,000 to 40,000 members of our forces could be found in far-reaching locations carrying out diverse missions such as suppressing Saddam Hussein's aggression, supporting stabilization in Bosnia, evacuating noncombatants from west Africa and Albania, fighting Indonesian fires, and providing emergency humanitarian assistance to China. I am proud to discuss these men and women with you today.

Our nation's all-volunteer military force remains the most formidable and respected in the world. 1998 marks the 25th anniversary of America's all-volunteer force, as well as the 50th anniversary of two events that have had a tremendous impact in shaping our force_President Truman's Executive Order 9981 which mandated equal treatment for all members of our armed forces and led to racial integration in our Services, and the Women's Armed Services Act of 1948-PL 625 which permanently established women in the Regular and Reserve components of our armed forces. Our all-volunteer force could not meet its force levels or mission requirements without the integration of women and minorities in our Services: racial and ethnic minorities represent one third, and women comprise 14 percent, of our military force today.

As the Department of Defense (DoD) reflects this year on the significance of these anniversaries for America's military and the qualities that have made our military strong, our DoD FY 1999 budget begins implementation of the Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) plan that will transform U.S. defense strategy and military forces to better meet future challenges. I have high confidence that top quality people and high readiness will remain hallmarks of America's military throughout this transformation. The QDR recommended end strengths and force levels that are only slightly below those already planned. We have made significant personnel reductions since 1987 with very few involuntary separations, due in large part to separation incentives and transitions programs that have been strongly supported by the Congress. The Department's proposed ``Department of Defense Reform Act of 1998'' provides for continuation of many of these incentives and programs through the year 2003. We urge your support of this legislation to limit the hardships of the drawdown on the departments dedicated men and women.

During my confirmation hearing last July, I outlined several priorities I planned to address during my tenure -- our military's high personnel and work tempo, the need for greater stability in the military career, and the importance of keeping the faith with our military retirees, particularly in the area of healthcare. These issues have served as a guideline in addressing what I consider to be the top three issues in personnel and readiness today:

Quality, Stability, Predictability

We must continue to recruit quality personnel to serve in our nation's defense. We must also provide them with rigorous and realistic training, the resources to do perform their job, predictable opportunities for career advancement and the quality of life that they and their families deserve.

RECRUITING
Each year, the Department must recruit about 200,000 young people for the active duty Armed Forces, and approximately 150,000 for the Selected Reserve. DoD closely monitors recruiting results throughout the year, reallocating manpower and resources when needed. We know that high-quality youth are more expensive to recruit, but we also know that they perform better both in training and on the job. They are also more likely to complete their terms of enlistment.

Over the past two decades, our Services have successfully attracted sufficient numbers of high-quality recruits. As we near the end of the drawdown, it is even more critical that our Services enlist sufficient recruits to develop a flow of seasoned leaders for the future. During FY 1997, 94 percent of active duty recruits held a high school diploma and 69 percent scored above average on the enlistment test. Both measures are substantially above our DoD benchmarks of 90 and 60 percent, respectively. FY 1998 recruiting, however, is proving more difficult due to a robust job market and greater interest in college.

The Air Force and Marine Corps are both meeting their numeric and quality goals; however, the proportion of high-quality recruits (high school diploma graduates scoring in the top half of the enlistment test) is down relative to last year for the Army. The Army has increased its College Fund and has put more money into enlistment bonuses as a result. Through the first quarter of FY 1998, the Navy has struggled with its numeric goals, as its accession mission increased by 10 percent from last year. In order to meet a higher recruiting objective, the Navy is increasing the number of field recruiters and has reallocated funds for advertising, education benefits and enlistment bonuses. DoD was successful in recruiting for the Reserve Components in FY 1997, with 89 percent of Reserve accessions holding a high school diploma, and almost two-thirds scoring above average on the enlistment test. Reserve recruiting is also expected to prove more challenging in FY 1998.

In addition, results from the most-recent Youth Attitude Tracking Survey indicate that propensity to enlist has slipped both for women and Hispanic men. Recruiting commands have asked recruiters to identify potential causes for these declines, and are reviewing surveys from DoD and academia to assess changes in Hispanic youth attitudes toward college education, entry-level work, and military service. DoD will also conduct focus groups with both women and Hispanic men over the next several months.

Consistent with guidance in the FY 1998 Defense Authorization Act, the Services are looking at how to improve recruit physical fitness during the Delayed Entry Program in order to improve training performance and lower attrition following enlistment. In addition, the Services, the General Accounting Office, and others have identified programs to reduce attrition by improving medical screening, pre-enlistment testing for substance abuse and coding of medical discharges to enhance feedback to medical screening officials, and improving management of recruiter incentives and selection.

DoD has also been reviewing the lack of early, accurate identification of individuals with arrest histories. Attrition rates for unsuitability due to unsatisfactory behavior during initial enlistments are nearly 65 percent higher among recruits with arrest records. A review of juvenile and adult arrest records in one state revealed that over 14 percent of new recruits from that state had an arrest record not previously identified through current screening methods. I urge your support of legislation the Department is proposing that will permit greater access to pre-accession offender records.

With regard to our officer accession programs, we are sustaining good balance; however, restrictions on our ability to bring foreign students to the Service academies were included in the National Defense Authorization Act for FY 1998 (section 543). Foreign participation at the academies has been an extremely valuable program over the years, benefiting both the US and foreign nations. The Department agrees that the program must be more narrowly focused and more rigorously managed. We are working hard to refine the program's criteria and hope the Committee would be willing to consider such revisions as part of the FY 1999 legislative cycle.

RETENTION AND MANAGEMENT

Our force today is better educated, more experienced and more diverse than before the drawdown. While retention patterns overall appear stable, this area is a key focal point for the Secretary of Defense and the Services. There are growing concerns for a number of officer and enlisted technical specialties, such as maintenance technicians, linguists, nuclear-trained officers and aviators. Realizing that retention is the aggregate of many factors, the Department and each of the Services are examining operational tempo, quality of life, and policy changes to address retention concerns. We continue to closely monitor aviator retention patterns by tracking cumulative continuation and resignation rates, as well as the competing opportunities on the outside that offer great incentives to our pilots. We appreciate the support of the subcommittee and Congress in strengthening aviator retention incentives by increasing the cap on Aviation Continuation Pay, authorizing more flexible contract periods, and increasing Aviation Career Incentive Pay effective January 1, 1999.

We are also continuing our efforts to improve joint officer management. We have been reviewing all joint officer positions to ensure that those meeting the full intent of law are on the joint duty assignment list. The review also prompted us to take a closer look at the lessons we have learned since enactment of the Goldwater-Nichols Act. Upon completing the review, we will forward our findings for your consideration. We have also been developing policy guidance for education and personnel management of Reserve component officers who serve in joint billets. To the extent practicable, this guidance will be similar to policies governing the Active component.

With regard to civilian personnel management, the Military Departments and Defense Agencies are consolidating functions from their installation Civilian Personnel Management Offices into 22 regional centers in order to improve productivity and customer service, while also reducing costs. Sixteen regional centers are currently operational. The Department is also developing a single, standard DoD civilian personnel information system that will enable immediate access and on-line updating.

TRAINING

High-quality, rigorous and realistic instruction is the foundation of personnel readiness_an essential ingredient in building and maintaining a ready force. Service members must be trained to carry out their assigned jobs and to perform as integral members of the military units to which they are assigned. With this in mind, on June 27, 1997, Secretary of Defense Cohen appointed an independent committee of private citizens to review gender-integrated training and related issues in the military Services. The committee was asked to assess current training programs and policies of the armed services, and to provide advice and recommendations to the Secretary for any changes or improvements necessary to assure the readiness and effectiveness of the all-volunteer force. The committee forwarded its findings and recommendations to the Secretary on December 16, 1997. The Services and Joint Chiefs of Staff are assessing the manpower and personnel implications of the recommendations and the costs associated with their implementation. These assessments were due to Secretary Cohen on March 16.

Civilian educational and professional development programs were addressed in the ``revolution'' of business practices mandated by the Quadrennial Defense Review. In that regard, the Defense Reform Initiative proposed creating a Chancellor for Education and Professional Development in order to raise the quality of DoD civilian education and professional development to world-class standards. This past year, DoD launched the Defense Leadership and Management Program (DLAMP) in order to better meet the need to systematically develop senior civilians with organizational and occupational breadth and depth, leadership skills and a shared sense of mission with the military.

DoD has several initiatives under way in the areas of embedded training and joint simulations. With embedded training, the Services can conduct more training at the operational unit rather than sending personnel to centralized training in the classroom or in field exercises. Joint simulation, using simulation and communications technologies to train joint and combined battle staffs, will be critical to our ability to conduct joint, interagency and coalition operations in the future. Through a common DOD-wide architecture and infrastructure, these initiatives will support training in all phases of military operations and assist in reducing the tempo of operations and resources required to train our personnel.

DoD is also working in concert with other government agencies and private sector participants to develop a common technical framework for delivering interactive education and training. This next-generation technology, called the Advanced Distributed Learning Initiative, is expected to significantly reduce costs by allowing widespread interactive sharing of courses and course content among participating public and private organizations.

QUALITY OF LIFE

The defense drawdown brought with it many changes, installation closures, job realignments, relocations, and uncertainty with a career in DoD_whether in uniform or as a civilian. With the help of Congress, the Department has made great strides in improving the quality of life of those who serve our nation. Specific improvements have been made in the areas of personnel tempo, pay and compensation, living environments, and community support programs.

PERSONNEL TEMPO: The time service members spend away from home for training and operations have surfaced as a readiness problem in certain skill groups and units. The greatest impact of post-Cold War Personnel Tempo (PERSTEMPO) has been on the Army and Air Force, which have seen increases in length and number of deployments. As the Navy and Marines are historically structured for deployment, the change in their deployment patterns has been less significant.

We have been working with the Services to more closely address and measure PERSTEMPO concerns. We began implementation of the Global Military Force Policy in 1996. Under this policy, the Services identify which units are ``high demand/low density'' units and declare, as a threshold, the rate at which these units can be deployed over a sustained period without causing PERSTEMPO problems. If requests by the CINCs for these units exceed the threshold, the Services and CINCs refine the requirements in order to avoid excessive demand. We are working to reduce the number of days associated with Joint Exercises by 25 percent by the end of Fiscal Year 2000, and are encouraging commanders at all levels to reduce unnecessary burdens where possible.

Our Reserve components are covering the entire spectrum of operations, from domestic emergencies to military operations in Bosnia. While indicators such as readiness, attrition, end strength, and employer relations show no short-term adverse impacts, we are closely monitoring these indicators as we rely on Reserve components more frequently to meet mission requirements.

COMPENSATION: The armed forces must provide a standard of living competitive with the private sector. DoD is committed to a system of compensation and benefits that ensures competitive pay as well as stability of benefits and retirement income. Our FY 1999 budget calls for a military pay raise of 3.1 percent, and we have continued to program for the full raises provided under law through the out-years of the Future Years Defense Program. Retired pay remains a top concern among our military personnel and has become a key retention issue. The predictability of an immediate annuity, as well as associated cost of living allowances (COLAs), for military members and the confidence that these entitlements will be maintained is essential to our ability to retain highly trained and seasoned mid-career personnel given the uncertainties and sacrifices inherent in military service.

Our 1998 legislative program included major changes to refine both housing and subsistence allowances, both of which were included in the FY 1998 National Defense Authorization Act. Congress also approved increases in hazardous duty incentive pay, aviation and nuclear officer bonuses and special pays, and the family separation allowance_all of which improve quality of life and boost retention. We appreciate Congressional action on these issues and in development of a hardship duty pay for service under arduous conditions. This, along with legislation that protects a member's pay from being reduced when he or she is deployed, will help mitigate some of the negative impacts of high operating tempo.

To ensure a robust military force in the future and maintain faith with our people, we may need to consider additional measures. We are exploring a payroll savings plan for service members and looking at whether or not using the employment cost index (ECI) minus one half percent is still an appropriate measure for setting the military pay raise.

While our focus this year will be mainly on implementing the new initiatives mentioned above, we have several important new legislative proposals in the area of military compensation. These include a provision to give the President the same authority to designate a ``qualified hazardous duty area,'' as he now has for combat zones and a provision to expand the authority of the Secretary of Defense to authorize commercial transportation for rest and recuperation travel.

COMMUNITY AND FAMILY SUPPORT PROGRAMS: Community and Family Support programs are essential to a healthy military community, particularly during times of high operational tempo and frequent deployments. The Department provides numerous community and family support, recreation, and education programs wherever service members and their families are stationed. In addition, recreation, voluntary education and social programs, and exchange outlets are located where our service members are deployed worldwide. DoD has integrated whenever possible Joint and Reserve Family Programs to provide better support for remotely located military personnel and those assigned where active component installations are not available.
Recent or upcoming highlights of some of our community and family support programs follow: